What is often a limitation of qualitative research?

Qualitative research is often lauded for its ability to provide rich, detailed insights into complex phenomena, allowing researchers to explore subjects in depth. However, one common limitation is its lack of generalizability. This stems from the fact that qualitative studies typically involve smaller, non-random samples focused on specific contexts, which means the findings may not be easily applicable to broader populations. In contrast to quantitative research, which aims to identify patterns and make predictions based on large datasets, qualitative research prioritizes understanding individual experiences and meanings, often leading to deeply contextualized findings that may not extrapolate well to other settings or groups.

The other options present inaccuracies. For instance, qualitative research does not rely on large datasets; instead, it often focuses on smaller samples for a deeper exploration of issues. It is also not characterized by speed or guaranteed reliability; the analysis of qualitative data can be time-consuming and requires careful interpretation. Therefore, while qualitative research is valuable for its depth, the limitation regarding generalizability is a crucial aspect that researchers must consider when designing studies and interpreting results.